Guidance on Time and Trouble Awards for Heat Network disputes
This guidance sets out Energy Ombudsman’s approach to ‘Time and Trouble’ awards by exploring general decision-making principles and financial awards for corrective action. In sharing our approach, we hope to help Heat Network Suppliers in considering how they might better deal with complaints directly.
Our main aim is to resolve disputes in a way that restores consumers to their pre-problem position.
Where it’s possible we’ll ask Heat Network Suppliers to correct what went wrong. This can include making awards that recognise the financial impact of an error. We call this ‘Corrective Action’.
Heat Network Suppliers should be able to address most problems. However, there are consequences such as time spent complaining, frustration, worry, or upset, which we sometimes prescribe financial awards to acknowledge. We call these ‘Time and Trouble’ awards.
Our conclusions aren’t designed to punish the Heat Network Suppliers, but to award the consumer based on the impact of the problem.
Corrective Action, Time and Trouble awards, and Impact are explored in more detail below:
Corrective Action
Where we conclude that a domestic or microbusiness consumer has been treated unfairly, we’ll require a resolution that returns them to their pre-problem position. Examples of such corrective action include:
‘Time and Trouble’ awards
If a consumer has been put to time and trouble by a Heat Network Supplier’s error or omission, it might be appropriate for them to provide an apology and / or a financial award. We base the appropriate award on certain criteria.
Time
‘Time’ refers to the inconvenience, hassle, and irritation caused to a consumer by a Heat Network Supplier’s actions. Examples of their time being negatively impacted could include:
Trouble
‘Trouble’ refers to the disappointment, worry, anxiety or upset caused by a Heat Network Supplier’s behaviour. Examples of Heat Network Suppliers behaviour being the cause of trouble might include:
Impact
Our awards recognise the impact of the problem on the consumer, not the perceived scale of the error. The same mistake can impact consumers in very different ways. Examples of how Heat Network Supplier’s behaviour might impact consumers differently could include:
Corrective action awards
Corrective action awards should reflect the impact of the time and trouble suffered. Whilst there’s an element of subjectivity and judgement involved, our Dispute Resolution Executives assess the appropriate level of time and trouble using a matrix. This correlates the significance of time and trouble suffered with the relevant award up to a maximum of £400. Whilst we may prescribe corrective action financial awards above this level, it would be rare to award above £400 for time and trouble alone.
Summary